I've just discovered a music writer and journalist named Simon Reynolds out of Good Britain. He seems to be, at a glance, an astute observer of the undercurrents and underpinnings of the R&D end of modern music. I have slung a strand on over to it from the Spyder Web.
"But faux-black was once no problem at all; it was what you did, as a matter of course, to be pop, if you were white; the terms of entry. (Okay, there's exceptions, country/folk/showbiz sources, and "that voice", but by and large, it's true, for the 1960s at least, Pop in the moving-forward sense was black voices/moves/rhythms and white people putting on black voices/moves/rhythms, seemingly without a pang or a doubt that this was anything but the most natural thing in the world to do.)
So what SFJ is mourning here really is the loss of nerve--of gall, even--that enabled white rockers and poppers in the 60s to front. That white negro leap of courage. Faking it, basically, but in the process creating a new self that became your authentic self; a postracial superself."
- Simon Reynolds, 10.16.07 on his Blissblog
Listed as his inspirations, the philosophers Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari.
So very easy for my mind to wander in this virtual world. Three hours later, I now return to report that OiNK.cd is dead. And this article is interesting: Indie is dead.
10.25.2007
10.24.2007
10.22.2007
It takes Guts!
Labels:
audiobooks,
books,
gross,
guts,
literature,
writing
10.16.2007
10.12.2007
Nearin on the Mul-Tie
My media are reproducing. My words abscond my illustrations. My pictures revoke my moovies. My blog vitiates my attempts at 'to wit'. Fuck words. Fuck Vegas. I made this: An ostentatious man will rather relate a blunder or an absurdity he has committed, than be debarred from talking of his own dear person.
- Joseph Addison
No, wait I didn't. How, usual to have been pegged before beginning to innovate. Technology seems the only socially legitimate medium for production. Culture, art, etc., are now reproductions of the previous. Create an original. I will worship you.
How many dolts have walked my path? 22 . . . million . . .
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
- Joseph Addison
No, wait I didn't. How, usual to have been pegged before beginning to innovate. Technology seems the only socially legitimate medium for production. Culture, art, etc., are now reproductions of the previous. Create an original. I will worship you.
How many dolts have walked my path? 22 . . . million . . .
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all y'all
Labels:
art,
connection,
culture,
literature,
quotations,
technology
10.02.2007
Copywrong
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
If I don't suck at the webbernet, y'all should now have notice that my blog is protected under copyright, with Creative Commons as my artistic aegis agency. I only ask for recognition if my ideas or creations are used elsewhere. Now I just need to post something worth a copyright.
2 B Cuntinyood
6.04.2007
Time to Spice Things UP!
Lamest Blog EVER!
My Picasa now has many of my new photos upon it.
My del.icio.us page will direct you to my favorite links, soon to be displayed more persuasively.
Other than that, be patient, something worthwhile may follow.
My Picasa now has many of my new photos upon it.
My del.icio.us page will direct you to my favorite links, soon to be displayed more persuasively.
Other than that, be patient, something worthwhile may follow.
5.22.2007
10.18.2006
Conspiracy
You know any environmentalists?
You know any conspirators?
Etymology.
Environmentalist: mindful of what you live in.
Conspiring: breathing with/together
Living in Portland has driven me to explore my predispositions against environmentalism. As a disclaimer, I feel guilty for the ways I think differently than the majority of those around me. Cite my Catholic upbringing, cite my Midwestern origin, cite what you like. The majority of those around me now seem to value a bird that dies by flying into a window more than most issues.
A flier at school (Lewis & Clark's proprietary law school) seeks to enlist fellow followers to record incidents of birds' kamikaze actions directed towards our law school's beautiful scene-framing windows. Poor birds. When the fight is at our doorstep (or windowsill), we do feel the rumble of battle.
Thousands of miles away, our citizens, or rather former citizens, now our military advocates fight under orders of which we and they do not know the real causes. I recently watched a film entitled "Why We Fight"; the same question I have been asking myself since I became conscious of the meaning of a fight (3rd grade, defending a boy with gills from an obese 2nd grade girl with misplaced aggression; I got sat on). Turns out, in my estimation, that no person fights for any better reason than I have ever fought: for justice, for injustice, for anger, for greed, for misunderstood altruism, for vice or virtue, depends on who's asking or watching.
Save the birds? Save the Muslims? Save the victims? Save the aggressors. From themselves, I argue, those with power should be shielded. In the words of anyone without it, or anyone who has seen its "swiss"ing of cheddar, power corrupts. I was raised with power, though my power was intrinsic, inconceivable to a child, inappropriate to one so young and naive. My power lies on a plateau among Americans. Who reading this has had a single day in their life where food, shelter, unconditional parental love, access to transportation or communication or protection was a viable question? No questions here, ever. Hate me if you like, it wasn't my choice, though I wouldn't forfeit this privilege for anything I've encountered beside it. My childhood was not wealthy, but it was distinctly rich.
So the dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago. I like the idea of dinosaurs, of creatures that used to rule and reign over the world and have perished. Romans. My recent research reveals that the extinction event that wiped them out occurred between the Cretaceous and Tertiary eras, which means long, long ago to laymen like me. Meteorites seem to still be the most accepted theory of causation, so I guess not much has changed since I was a kid after all.
Dinosaurs dropped the ball, humans are on their way. "Dinosaur" comes from words meaning "terrible lizard." I wonder what they'll call us. Homo stupidiens?
Long live Earth. Short-lived is humanity.
You know any conspirators?
Etymology.
Environmentalist: mindful of what you live in.
Conspiring: breathing with/together
Living in Portland has driven me to explore my predispositions against environmentalism. As a disclaimer, I feel guilty for the ways I think differently than the majority of those around me. Cite my Catholic upbringing, cite my Midwestern origin, cite what you like. The majority of those around me now seem to value a bird that dies by flying into a window more than most issues.
A flier at school (Lewis & Clark's proprietary law school) seeks to enlist fellow followers to record incidents of birds' kamikaze actions directed towards our law school's beautiful scene-framing windows. Poor birds. When the fight is at our doorstep (or windowsill), we do feel the rumble of battle.
Thousands of miles away, our citizens, or rather former citizens, now our military advocates fight under orders of which we and they do not know the real causes. I recently watched a film entitled "Why We Fight"; the same question I have been asking myself since I became conscious of the meaning of a fight (3rd grade, defending a boy with gills from an obese 2nd grade girl with misplaced aggression; I got sat on). Turns out, in my estimation, that no person fights for any better reason than I have ever fought: for justice, for injustice, for anger, for greed, for misunderstood altruism, for vice or virtue, depends on who's asking or watching.
Save the birds? Save the Muslims? Save the victims? Save the aggressors. From themselves, I argue, those with power should be shielded. In the words of anyone without it, or anyone who has seen its "swiss"ing of cheddar, power corrupts. I was raised with power, though my power was intrinsic, inconceivable to a child, inappropriate to one so young and naive. My power lies on a plateau among Americans. Who reading this has had a single day in their life where food, shelter, unconditional parental love, access to transportation or communication or protection was a viable question? No questions here, ever. Hate me if you like, it wasn't my choice, though I wouldn't forfeit this privilege for anything I've encountered beside it. My childhood was not wealthy, but it was distinctly rich.
So the dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago. I like the idea of dinosaurs, of creatures that used to rule and reign over the world and have perished. Romans. My recent research reveals that the extinction event that wiped them out occurred between the Cretaceous and Tertiary eras, which means long, long ago to laymen like me. Meteorites seem to still be the most accepted theory of causation, so I guess not much has changed since I was a kid after all.
Dinosaurs dropped the ball, humans are on their way. "Dinosaur" comes from words meaning "terrible lizard." I wonder what they'll call us. Homo stupidiens?
Long live Earth. Short-lived is humanity.
Labels:
dinosaurs,
environment,
evolution,
extinction,
global warming,
liberal,
military,
Portland
9.26.2006
One page on.
New concept. One page on (insert hopefully novel topic here).
On the Rockford Bar Crawl this year I threatened to stab a guy in the mouth for harassing the door guys at Bar Louie. I didn't have a knife. It worked though, he left...without any stab wounds in his mouth and I managed to get the stragglers of the RBC into the bar. Sorry to whoever got in my way that night, I don't know my own strength sometimes, just in a left-handed way (it's less than what I think).
Onwards Ho!
One page on politics.
Some of my new colleagues and contemporaries at Lewis & Clark's law school have recently made mention of an upcoming gubernatorial election here in Oregon. There're even friggin' Facebook profiles for the candidates for governor. http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=500077589
So Gov. Kulongoski isn't doing so hot in the surveyUSA.com approval ratings. http://surveyusa.com/50State2006/50StateGovernor060921State.htm
I looked over the demographical breakdown of these approval ratings until I was pissed off and satisfied. The demographical distribution follows that of the state of Oregon's population closely across the board (gender, race, age, etc.). They (surveyUSA.com) profess that the sampling error is +/-4%. Sounds good for a sample size of 600 out of 3.6 million right? Where do they find this sample of Oregon? I'd love to have them to bounce ideas off of.
Turns out, after a quick look into the website's statement of methodology, I would just have to randomly dial Oregon phone numbers and give thousands of people a professionally recorded telephone survey to get the opinion of these 600 ordinary Oregonians. Does anyone out there take random unsolicited phone surveys? Do the people that do represent the population of voters in Oregon well? Do politicians cater their platforms and campaigning to a public they see based on bullshit systems of surveying the public like this? What self-respecting, politically-informed, well-educated American takes the time out of corrupting and exploiting humanity and the Earth to answer a recorded phone survey on what they about the Gubernator?
I guess I didn't mean this to be a page of questions. Who's going to answer? They're rhetorical, all of them. The answers in my limited ignornant view would be no, no, I hope not, and no one respectively.
I wish I knew more about the inner workings of a campaign and the political engine that runs beneath/within it. Ignorance is not bliss if the stats scream lies.
On the Rockford Bar Crawl this year I threatened to stab a guy in the mouth for harassing the door guys at Bar Louie. I didn't have a knife. It worked though, he left...without any stab wounds in his mouth and I managed to get the stragglers of the RBC into the bar. Sorry to whoever got in my way that night, I don't know my own strength sometimes, just in a left-handed way (it's less than what I think).
Onwards Ho!
One page on politics.
Some of my new colleagues and contemporaries at Lewis & Clark's law school have recently made mention of an upcoming gubernatorial election here in Oregon. There're even friggin' Facebook profiles for the candidates for governor. http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=500077589
So Gov. Kulongoski isn't doing so hot in the surveyUSA.com approval ratings. http://surveyusa.com/50State2006/50StateGovernor060921State.htm
I looked over the demographical breakdown of these approval ratings until I was pissed off and satisfied. The demographical distribution follows that of the state of Oregon's population closely across the board (gender, race, age, etc.). They (surveyUSA.com) profess that the sampling error is +/-4%. Sounds good for a sample size of 600 out of 3.6 million right? Where do they find this sample of Oregon? I'd love to have them to bounce ideas off of.
Turns out, after a quick look into the website's statement of methodology, I would just have to randomly dial Oregon phone numbers and give thousands of people a professionally recorded telephone survey to get the opinion of these 600 ordinary Oregonians. Does anyone out there take random unsolicited phone surveys? Do the people that do represent the population of voters in Oregon well? Do politicians cater their platforms and campaigning to a public they see based on bullshit systems of surveying the public like this? What self-respecting, politically-informed, well-educated American takes the time out of corrupting and exploiting humanity and the Earth to answer a recorded phone survey on what they about the Gubernator?
I guess I didn't mean this to be a page of questions. Who's going to answer? They're rhetorical, all of them. The answers in my limited ignornant view would be no, no, I hope not, and no one respectively.
I wish I knew more about the inner workings of a campaign and the political engine that runs beneath/within it. Ignorance is not bliss if the stats scream lies.
Labels:
campaign,
demographics,
one page on,
politics,
Portland,
statistics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

